Last week, we blogged that we’re going to open up the blog to local candidates. We offered them the opportunity to make one final case as to why they deserve their vote and why they are the best candidate for the job. Our caveat to everyone was that we didn’t want personal attacks or other negative stuff.
Today, we have an editorial from Congressman Phil English, running for re-election in the 3rd Congressional district of Pennsylvania. He was elected to the House of Representatives in 1994, gaining the seat left by Tom Ridge after his run for Governor of Pennsylvania.
It has been and will continue to be my distinguished honor to represent the families, seniors and entrepreneurs of Pennsylvania’s 3rd Congressional District. Over the years, I have been a strong, independent voice for western Pennsylvania in Washington, fighting to represent Pennsylvania values.
I have challenged the leadership of my Party and broken with the Bush Administration routinely. Whether it is fighting for fair wages for local workers, helping local entrepreneurs expand their business and create new jobs, ensuring the Erie VAMC stays open to provide quality care to local vets, breaking down the barriers to higher education, preserving the beauty of Presque Isle State Park, or making sure local families can afford to fill their cars with gas and pay their home heating bills, I am committed to building the economy of the future right here in northwestern Pennsylvania.
As a leader on the House Ways and Means Committee, which has jurisdiction over taxes, Medicare and trade, I have put my position to work for communities in our region and fought for lower taxes, tougher action on illegal imports and increased resources for healthcare providers. In fact, since the 104th Congress, I have had nearly 50 different legislative measures enacted into law and directed over $150 million to critical local projects.
As a strong advocate for lower and fairer taxes, I’ve held the line on government waste, saying no to taxes that hurt employers and working families and no the Wall Street bailout. I’ve also fought to eliminate the marriage penalty, increase the child tax credit, and create tax incentives to increase access to higher education.
Having introduced legislation that will help employers make capital investments and create jobs, I believe Congress must be vigilant in enacting policies that will close loopholes that ship jobs overseas.
I’ve long advocated for fair trade and a strong U.S. trade policy. I have supported local manufacturers and have sponsored and fought for legislation to strengthen domestic trade laws to better protect U.S. companies against unfair foreign trade.
And, despite my opponent’s accusation, I was not even in Congress when NAFTA was enacted in 1993 under the Clinton Administration. In fact, I called for the renegotiation of the flawed trade pact in 2005 and have sought a new agreement that will strengthen, not hinder our trading relations as well as include enforceable labor and environmental standards in the agreement.
As our country continues to battle record high energy prices, I believe the federal government must embrace a strong, effective comprehensive energy plan that deploys domestic energy sources, like coal, oil shale and natural gas in an environmentally-friendly manner. I have long worked to get new energy industries like Hodge Foundry in Greenville and GE – Erie County’s largest employer off the ground as an advocate for tax incentives that boost the use of renewable energy like wind. I have also endorsed the “Drill Here, Drill Now” pledge and believe we must take the appropriate steps to encourage environmentally sound drilling in the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR).
As a strong, independent voice for Pennsylvania in Washington, I ask for your vote again this Tuesday, November 4th. Together we can truly make a difference and build a better future for our region.




We all know that the candidates LIE and promise changes they have NO chance of makeing I have to vote with all this in mind . If they have to go to thowing DIRT THEN THATS IT. ANDY
Don't look at his promises, look at his record. He brings the money back for reinvestment in the district and he has crossed party lines as a moderate. He was endorsed by the NEA ( National Education Association, the country's biggest teachers union) and he voted against the obscenely large bailout TWICE! He appeals to many factions of both parties and we are lucky to have him serving for us. Plus he got us the money for the sand replenishment.
Did anyone form his campaign state why it took so long for them to recognize this as a useful outlet for their information?
Phil,
I have met you a few times and you seen like a pretty intelligent guy. However, I do not undertand some of your negative campaigning. Perhaps, it falls into line with the whole Republican fear-mongering thing, and maybe it will work for you come election day.
The Times has already raked you over the coals for the bike riding commercial, not even mentioning the fact that it doesn't look like you could even make it around the block on a bike. Now, we're getthing this “Kathy Dahlkemper a millionaire” message. Well, what's your net worth big boy? I don't think you're starvin'
Phil,
Can you explain why you take money from oil and gas company's?
National Fuel raises my rates every year, yet you accepted $17,350.00 in cash from them. How many homes could that heat?
(citation link)
http://oilmoney.priceofoil.org/federalRaceGraph…
Isn't this blatantly paying off a government official?
In fact, You accepted $137,075.00 from the oil and gas industry since 2000 and voted in the industries favor 73% of the time.
Also, in your commercials you state that you voted for all kinds of Veterans benefits. You even stated that in your article above.
Yet on 5/21/08 Vote 347: H R 3819: Veterans Emergency Care Fairness Act of 2008 and 5/23/07 Vote 410: H R 67: Veterans Outreach Improvement Act. your record clearly shows that you didn't even show up to vote.
Phil negative? Kinda like how Kathy accuses him of voting FOR NAFTA when he wasn't even in Congress when President Clinton, a Democrat, signed into law in 1993? We don'y know how much Kathy is worth since she, unlike Hillary Clinton & Barack Obama, won't release her tax returns, but 12 acres with a lake view is easy to find a market price for. Maybe she doesn't want to show her many employees how much she makes compared to them.
Making fun of Phil's weight, geez that's clever. Supply & Demand works, the more there is of something the less is costs. Phil consistently votes for more drilling and easier energy exploration, adding to the supply which will lower prices. That's good for the gas industry how?
Obama voted FOR the latest energy bill ( it was terrible & I'm glad it failed) but it had tax breaks for big oil & gas. How do you feel about it him now?